18.7.09

"AFTER THIS"

The story and themes of Alice McDermott's After This are not new. This brief but very finely wrought novel takes on nothing more or less than the ups and downs of one suburban American family (this one happens to be Irish Catholic) from post-WWII optimism to Vietnam-era confusion. McDermott's grasp of the historical moment is knowledgeable and sensitive, and she sugarcoats nothing, but what she has created is not a sweeping historical panorama or retrospective weighing of American right or wrong; McDermott doesn't seem to be particularly concerned with capturing the Meaning of a Cultural Moment. It is, however, precisely the novel's apparent objectivity--its distance, its preference for potently evoking the local experience of the joy and pain of the march of time rather than interpreting it--that gives it weight and, not despite but because of the distance of its perspective, an inconspicuous but permeating empathy.



After This is thus, in the best possible way, an exercise in style and structure. That is not to say that there's anything "experimental" or "avant-garde" about it; Alice McDermott is not Donald Barthelme; she is not really interested in showily scorching the earth of the prose world. But McDermott has staked the uniqueness of her readers' experience primarily upon the novel's seemingly cool, sometimes almost entirely dispassionate tone and lacuna-ridden structure (McDermott clearly cares nothing about congratulating herself for her literary prowess and sophistication, but After This puts its own inevitable ellipses to impressively self-aware use. The novel appears to compile what amounts to a rather small, somewhat desultorily connected handful of episodes experienced by the two generations of the Keane family of Long Island. But one feels that McDermott has devoted vast amounts of time, thought, and even preparatory writing to an infinitely detailed rendering of the entire inner and outer life of each of the novel's characters, then painstakingly eliminated everything save for those portions she feels are most rewarding and rich in their eventful opacity, in their potential for letting us know her characters from the most authentic and least reductive angle.

The effect is that of observing an array of starkly glistening iceberg tips protruding through the surface of a wide ocean, and from those tiny but salient signs immediately, wordlessly knowing--feeling deep in your bones, in all their detail, without the need for continued explanation and worrying-over of the issue--the inexpressibly vast seas below.

18.6.09

"DEUX OU TROIS CHOSES...."

The demands of Academe (and the shameful ease with which I can be made to feel overwhelmed) have effectively kept me from blogging for a very long while, but an all-too-short breather between spring and summer quarters affords me a window of opportunity in which to very briefly run down, in bare-bones style, a smattering of the things that have been going on in my life since last time:



--I spent August of 2008 at La Maison des étudiants canadiens in Paris, participating in a study-abroad program offered jointly by the Departments of Comparative Literature and French at UW. I read Les Lettres d'Abelard et Héloïse, found Susan Sontag's grave in Montparnasse, rode the Metro (le RER en particulier!) everywhere, and learned all about the evolution of the city over the course of its loooong and fascinating history.

--I ended a six-year relationship (on an amicable note, fortunately, as we continued to share the apartment for several months!). Break-ups are always painful, but because of its amicability--the fact that we both had become aware of and were in some mutual accord about our suitability as friends and our growing incompatibility as anything more--this one was actually easier than the ending of any other relationship I've had, although neither of us had ever been with anyone for nearly as long as we had been with each other. Is it possible that a relationship can actually just run its course, and the reason all my other break-ups were so much more memorably painful was that I felt those relationships never got a chance to run theirs? Of course, I also have to consider that I'm not as young now as I was then, and I've experienced a few more hard knocks of various types in the meantime, which may have toughened me up a bit....



--Love came back into my life in the form of a (now former) Mississippian, the wonderful and one-of-a-kind Cameron Smith, with whom I drove from Jackson back to Seattle in mid-December (just in time for us to survive the kind of freakish cold snap that rarely happens in Seattle, let alone in the South!). Cameron is a fellow cinéphile, and I see Seattle, a place about which I complain probably too often, through fresh(er) eyes now; what with the Landmark Theatres, The Northwest Film Forum, and The Seattle International Film Festival Revival Screen (all of which we've been happily frequenting together in the past six months), this town is a cinematic wonderland, particularly compared to the many, many areas of the country where someone who wanted to see, for example, Kiyoshi Kurosawa's Tokyo Sonata would simply be out of luck (I've been told that such things cannot even be found in the video stores in a great many non-coastal U.S. towns). Of course, a wide range of cinematic options can't be considered the only thing that makes a city livable. But for those of us who are so inclined, it makes up for any number of drawbacks (like unbelievable daily traffic on perpetually crumbling roads, to cite the example that springs most quickly to mind). I also consider my own quality of life greatly enhanced by the fact that I am now almost always accompanied to the movies by someone with whom to hold hands and discuss the film afterwards.



--"Advanced" French (I would be more modest and just call it "third-year," as I hardly feel "advanced," but that's what the school calls it, so...) is markedly more interesting and, for related reasons, more difficult than "beginning" and "intermediate" years. It's been only days since the end of what turned out to be a grueling six months of French 302/303, and I don't know whether my long sigh of the final day was one of relief or one of un peu de douleur for the rollercoaster grinding to a halt. In any case, I thought I'd attempt a tiny act of commemoration of some of the primary rewards I got for all the sang, sueur, et larmes: 1) I wouldn't dare do it sans dictionnaire, and it's very slow going, always, but thanks to the push into the deep end one is given in the third year, I can actually read French now. During the last couple of quarters, over three different courses (two language courses and one literature course taught in English but with readings in French), I read Irène Némirovsky's Suite française; Victor Hugo's Claude Gueux and Le Dernier jour d'un condamné à mort; Balzac's Le Curé de Tours; Flaubert's Un Cœur simple, Proust's Un Amour de Swann, and Sartre's Les Mots, among others. 2) The in-class films were, as they have been each year, revisitations and revelations of some of the greatest Francophone cinema. We watched Cocteau's La Belle et la bête and Ousmane Sembène's La Noire de... in my "intermediate" classes. Among the "advanced" year films were La Grande illusion, Laurent Cantet's Ressources humaines, and Andrez Wajda's glorious Danton (Criterion finally released it on DVD, and my French professor already had it for us to watch the following week!), which I had seen before but which I did not remember being such a fine piece of work. Its use of striking, Penderecki/Lygeti-like music is, to my mind, a link between Kubrick and Paul Thomas Anderson's There Will Be Blood.

5.7.08

"THE RETURN OF INSPIRATION"



Bernard Butler is a living sign that the best move for a muso who bravely resists his or her “proficiency”-obsessed leanings is to find a counterbalancing collaborator who can let some air into all their musty old know-how. That Butler is a richly gifted guitarist is beyond any doubt, and that he can write a musical track and engineer a record has been proven many times over. But then there’s the niggling issue of his two just-okay and thus disappointing solo albums; it’s not so much “the less said, the better” as it is that there’s really nothing much to say about them. When Suede appeared in the early 1990s, the conjunction of Brett Anderson’s decadent lyrics and vocal melodies with Butler’s excessive way with a guitar garnered the group comparisons to The Smiths’ analogous Morrissey/Johnny Marr teamwork. Unfortunately, it appears that by the same token, Butler solo suffers from Johnny Marr Solo Syndrome: like Marr, his passable, nondescript singing and bland, uninspired way with words are dwarfed to the point of embarrassment by an ability to make music that deserves so much better.

Hence I prefer Butler in collaboration. Whether it’s the gorgeous second McAlmont & Butler album or his all-too-short-lived Brett Anderson reunion, The Tears, the Butler touch almost always makes a delicious cake just waiting to be iced by the right vocalist/lyricist (David McAlmont, Brett Anderson, et al). Butler brought his remarkably Spector-like wall-of-sound production techniques to those albums, and recently he’s bestowed the same favor upon a couple of releases that have found their way into my frequent rotation: Duffy’s Rockferry, half of which is done according to the Butler recipe; and, even more so, Sons and Daughters’ even-more-fantastic-than-expected second album, This Gift.


The Amy Winehouse comparisons to which Duffy has been subjected are, in my view, superficial and unfair. I find both Winehouse’s persona and her sound to be surprisingly gimmicky in light of the frequently respectful critical attention she’s received (we won’t discuss the scads of the other kind of attention she seems more than willing to participate in). Winehouse collaborator Mick Ronson is no Bernard Butler, and though his recent production on the latest Kaiser Chiefs album shows him to be capable of bringing a certain apt razzle-dazzle to those particular proceedings, it’s certainly too slick to compare with Butler’s multidimensional sound when one is talking about “soul.” To my ears, Winehouse sounds like Annie Lennox without the saving self-awareness; evidently, when it comes to icy calculation, the difference between intentional/by design and unintentional makes all the difference.

Duffy, on the other hand, has the slightly nasal humanity and guileless confidence of a Ronnie Spector. I can appreciate the notable catchiness of Winehouse’s “Rehab,” but the title track from Rockferry--a hymn to one’s own confidence and independence in the face of always-looming heartbreak--has all the defiance without needing recourse to the gossipy and self-referential. The majestically Spector-al “Distant Dreamer,” though--with its surpassingly sweet melody and its little echoes of The Ronettes’ “I Wonder”--is my favorite track on the album. Butler progressively adds layers of percussion and strings as Duffy becomes more and more insistent on a future (take that, “God Save the Queen”!), the music and voice escalating together into a gorgeous climax, which is the only really apt word to describe the triumphant heights scaled by “Distant Dreamer.”



As enjoyable as I find Rockferry, This Gift is the out-and-out masterpiece of the Butler productions under discussion. I admired Sons & Daughters’ début long-player, The Repulsion Box, and the elements that made that album so strong--the band’s brilliant way with a melody, their commitment to classical pop dynamics and punk energy, and their passionately sensitive lyrics as brought to life through the technically very imperfect and supremely expressive voices of Adele Bethel and (less often, but very brogue-ishly effective) Scott Paterson--are still in abundant evidence. But This Gift’s great leap forward lies in its full-bodied production; The Repulsion Box, for all its propulsion, sounds skeletal and thin by comparison. Here, Butler has encouraged the group to employ as many hand-claps, tambourines--generally as many dimensions and textures of sound--as can reasonably be employed in the pursuit of richness (as opposed to clutter, which the album adroitly sidesteps).

This Gift’s first single and opening track, “Gilt Complex,” is a stomping indictment of liberal guilt and self-congratulatory faux-action; “The Nest” has a Northern Soul beat deepened, with Butler’s echo-y touch and the sublime guitar melody swinging its way through the spaces in between, into something profound (later in the album, “Iodine” performs a similar trick to almost equally great effect). Countless songs have used it, but “The Nest” truly earns its brief but satisfying “Be My Baby” drum break towards the end.

The second single, “Darling,” which refers in both title and theme to the John Schlesinger film with Julie Christie as an unfortunate “darling bride,” includes all the pleasures of ‘60s pop values (impassioned, simple, meaningful lyrics spun into gold with irresistible catchiness) to match its ‘60s cinematic reference. “House in My Head” offers a perfected version of the first album’s punk energy; its tension-and-release dynamic, coupled with powerful lyrics about the lingering vestigial scars, defective influences, and unfulfilled longings of our formative years,

Butler aids the group in incorporating softer layers, too. The superlative “Split Lips” lifts the piano melody from Patti Smith’s “Because the Night” and provides its own extra-tender vocal melodies and post-traumatic lyrics (“Mixed-up words, find out what you meant/Watching the scene after the accident”) to top it off. In manifesting so brilliantly the pleasures available from pop music, virtually every song on the album could be described as decadent, and Sons & Daughters know that that adjective can really only ever be complimentary to the kind of art they’re creating.

As the “Johnny Marr” of Suede, perhaps Butler had little chance of bettering his counterpart in The Smiths, not least because circumstances did not allow him an equal time span. Post-band, however, I’d submit that Johnny Marr’s session work, production work, and solo projects have never really come close to reaching these heights. Mr. Marr is a musical genius, no doubt; but give me the magic, behind-the-scenes touch but recognizable touch like the one Butler has brought to “Rockferry” and “This Gift” over The Healers or Modest Mouse any day.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]